views_handler_field_comment_node_link.inc
Same filename in other branches
File
-
modules/
comment/ views_handler_field_comment_node_link.inc
View source
<?php
/**
* Handler for showing comment module's node link.
*
* @ingroup views_field_handlers
*/
class views_handler_field_comment_node_link extends views_handler_field {
function construct() {
parent::construct();
// Add the node fields that comment_link will need..
$this->additional_fields['nid'] = array(
'field' => 'nid',
);
$this->additional_fields['type'] = array(
'field' => 'type',
);
$this->additional_fields['comment'] = array(
'field' => 'comment',
);
}
function option_definition() {
$options = parent::option_definition();
$options['teaser'] = array(
'default' => 0,
);
return $options;
}
function options_form(&$form, &$form_state) {
parent::options_form($form, $form_state);
$form['teaser'] = array(
'#type' => 'checkbox',
'#title' => t('Show teaser-style link'),
'#default_value' => $this->options['teaser'],
'#description' => t('Show the comment link in the form used on standard node teasers, rather than the full node form.'),
);
}
function query() {
$this->ensure_my_table();
$this->add_additional_fields();
}
function render($values) {
// Build fake $node.
$node = new stdClass();
$node->nid = $this->get_value($values, 'nid');
$node->type = $this->get_value($values, 'type');
$node->comment = $this->get_value($values, 'comment');
// Call comment.module's hook_link: comment_link($type, $node = NULL, $teaser = FALSE)
$links = comment_link('node', $node, $this->options['teaser']);
// question: should we run these through: drupal_alter('link', $links, $node);
// might this have unexpected consequences if these hooks expect items in $node that we don't have?
return !empty($links) ? theme('links', $links, array(
'class' => 'links inline',
)) : '';
}
}
Classes
Title | Deprecated | Summary |
---|---|---|
views_handler_field_comment_node_link | Handler for showing comment module's node link. |